In August, we found out that financial aid offices at universities were getting paid by student loan providers for creating a situation in which prospective students saw limited loan options. Later in the month, one of my favorite New York Times investigative reporters, Diane Jean Schemo, wrote about a similar market-fixing situation among popular “study abroad” programs. In some cases, it is charged that colleges received cash rebates for restricting a student’s choice of programs international to the chosen few. While the office of New York Attorney General investigates these alleged misdeeds, the major industry trade association is starting to make noises about writing guidelines and self regulation.

The Blue Lake take on it:
A victimless crime? I don’t think so. Student loans and study-abroad programs seem like “good” things – all “good” parents want their child to get a higher education, and if the university has hand-picked these providers of student loans and semesters in Europe, why should they challenge them? Yes, there are much more serious white-collar crimes out there, but it really gets under the skin when the deception is practiced by those in the education arena. If you want to read about what happens when student are steered toward private loans with hard to discern interest rates, Schemo uncovered some gems. Maybe it’s time we realize that higher education, like health care, is an industry that has long since move on from it’s “not for profit” roots.

Leave a Clever Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)